In an unexpected turn of events I've managed to spend two consecutive nights in my living room, in the dark, with Yoshimura. The surprise attack of Eraserhead on Sunday night followed by the equally surprising arrival of a rather extensive collection of Stan Brakhage short films on Monday has proven entertaining and extremely enlightening.
I've long been a fan of film, I'd imagine at least since I got to see Return of the Jedi in the theater as a child. Like every other kid I loved the movies, especially ones cleverly targeted at my specific age group (let's face it folks, The Sandlot is awesome, that discussion is off the table). But it wasn't until I grew up a little and saw Pulp Fiction and Clerks that I began to realize how much I thoroughly enjoyed film, and how determined I was to see it all.
I've never had any film classes, never studied theory at USC or had stirring guest lectures at NYU. What I have managed to do is read nearly everything that I can get my hands on that points me in certain directions, turns me on to new things and then through the awesome power of Netflix and the DVD I can actually see these things in my own home. This brings me back to my original point... Stan Brakhage. There is no other time in my life where these films could or would have made sense to me. It's not for everyone, but if you find yourself wrapped up in what he's doing then you'll be there all night.
Even if you don't care for the man's work, it would be incredibly difficult not to appreciate the four short documentaries that come packaged in with the films, "Brackhage on Brakhage I-IV." In these he discusses his work, his life, his reactionary stance to Andy Warhol's "Factory" and his younger days with Jackson Pollock. In one especially interesting story he tells of the New York art society relocating for one night to a cabin in the woods to eyeball the latest efforts from Mr. Pollock.
As Pollock heard one critic mumbling about the importance of chance in his work he grew angry. In a drunken fury of swear words he pulled from behind him a brush and demanded the audience look to a doorknob on the other side of the room. With a whip of the brush a small drop of paint sailed across the room, hitting the knob dead-center. He turned back to his critics and said, "That's what I think of chance, now there's the fucking door."
Listening to that story really made me think about art in general. I've never been an art aficionado by any stretch of the imagination, but I do know what I enjoy. I enjoy museums, and I thoroughly enjoyed the two semesters of art history that I took in college. Unfortunately, compared to at least two of the people in my immediate circle of friends my art knowledge borders on that of your average potted plant (and that's just the individuals that I know of, for all I know I could be the absolute bottom rung of the totem pole). But I figured I'd try something a little different with Blogjammin' today and show off a few of the pieces that I actually really enjoy.
First, we'll stick with the Abstract Impressionists. Mark Rothko's "Orange and Yellow" is just an absolutely beautiful and comforting piece. I was initially drawn to it while flipping through an art textbook and noticing it not for it's aesthetic quality, but because an original painting from a friend of mine that once hung over my bed appeared to be so strongly influenced by it. After looking into Rothko's other work I found many other pieces to be equally comforting, but why not stick with my first.
Next, the Neo-Dadists, and my favorite artist, Claes Oldenburg. It's difficult for me to say which of Oldenburg's works is my favorite, but "Soft Pay Telephone" seemed to be the most appropriate for this particular post. I absolutely love the use of simple materials to bend such common objects around one man's perspective, changing the appearance so drastically while still maintaining it's general form.
Finally, "Untitled" by Robert Rauschenberg. It seems as if Rauschenberg's work has had more of an influence on the people around me than I'd originally thought. Looking at some of the work put on display at this year's Millard L. Webb Film Festival frequently put me in the mindset of this painting in particular. However, don't deny yourself the pleasure of "Shades" or "Labor's Centennial."
So, there you go. I've talked about film, politics, society and now art. Just trying to branch out a little, cover some new things to keep you on your toes. I'd imagine that about ten people have made it this far into this post... and that may be generous. However, if you're still reading this then let me say thank you. I certainly appreciate it. After all, it's what blogging is all about, right... sharing ideas.
I've long been a fan of film, I'd imagine at least since I got to see Return of the Jedi in the theater as a child. Like every other kid I loved the movies, especially ones cleverly targeted at my specific age group (let's face it folks, The Sandlot is awesome, that discussion is off the table). But it wasn't until I grew up a little and saw Pulp Fiction and Clerks that I began to realize how much I thoroughly enjoyed film, and how determined I was to see it all.
I've never had any film classes, never studied theory at USC or had stirring guest lectures at NYU. What I have managed to do is read nearly everything that I can get my hands on that points me in certain directions, turns me on to new things and then through the awesome power of Netflix and the DVD I can actually see these things in my own home. This brings me back to my original point... Stan Brakhage. There is no other time in my life where these films could or would have made sense to me. It's not for everyone, but if you find yourself wrapped up in what he's doing then you'll be there all night.
Even if you don't care for the man's work, it would be incredibly difficult not to appreciate the four short documentaries that come packaged in with the films, "Brackhage on Brakhage I-IV." In these he discusses his work, his life, his reactionary stance to Andy Warhol's "Factory" and his younger days with Jackson Pollock. In one especially interesting story he tells of the New York art society relocating for one night to a cabin in the woods to eyeball the latest efforts from Mr. Pollock.
As Pollock heard one critic mumbling about the importance of chance in his work he grew angry. In a drunken fury of swear words he pulled from behind him a brush and demanded the audience look to a doorknob on the other side of the room. With a whip of the brush a small drop of paint sailed across the room, hitting the knob dead-center. He turned back to his critics and said, "That's what I think of chance, now there's the fucking door."
Listening to that story really made me think about art in general. I've never been an art aficionado by any stretch of the imagination, but I do know what I enjoy. I enjoy museums, and I thoroughly enjoyed the two semesters of art history that I took in college. Unfortunately, compared to at least two of the people in my immediate circle of friends my art knowledge borders on that of your average potted plant (and that's just the individuals that I know of, for all I know I could be the absolute bottom rung of the totem pole). But I figured I'd try something a little different with Blogjammin' today and show off a few of the pieces that I actually really enjoy.
Don't run away just yet, it's only three... I swear.
First, we'll stick with the Abstract Impressionists. Mark Rothko's "Orange and Yellow" is just an absolutely beautiful and comforting piece. I was initially drawn to it while flipping through an art textbook and noticing it not for it's aesthetic quality, but because an original painting from a friend of mine that once hung over my bed appeared to be so strongly influenced by it. After looking into Rothko's other work I found many other pieces to be equally comforting, but why not stick with my first.
Next, the Neo-Dadists, and my favorite artist, Claes Oldenburg. It's difficult for me to say which of Oldenburg's works is my favorite, but "Soft Pay Telephone" seemed to be the most appropriate for this particular post. I absolutely love the use of simple materials to bend such common objects around one man's perspective, changing the appearance so drastically while still maintaining it's general form.
Finally, "Untitled" by Robert Rauschenberg. It seems as if Rauschenberg's work has had more of an influence on the people around me than I'd originally thought. Looking at some of the work put on display at this year's Millard L. Webb Film Festival frequently put me in the mindset of this painting in particular. However, don't deny yourself the pleasure of "Shades" or "Labor's Centennial."
So, there you go. I've talked about film, politics, society and now art. Just trying to branch out a little, cover some new things to keep you on your toes. I'd imagine that about ten people have made it this far into this post... and that may be generous. However, if you're still reading this then let me say thank you. I certainly appreciate it. After all, it's what blogging is all about, right... sharing ideas.
5 Comments:
You should do that more often! Though your poorly-photoshopped(ms-paint'd) pictures of drunk athletes hugging fat girls are nice, I enjoyed all the things you put up today. Ah hell, I'm just glad it's not about basketball! But seriously, nice post
-JEFF
First off I would like to say that Sandlot f'n rules, and it always has ruled, and to be honest, it always will rule. Second, Brakhage, oh Brakhage. What a genius. If you want to see what the world would be like if you took the mind numbing perfection and rapid fire sounds of Squarepusher's music and applied it on a visual spectrum, and then date it back 40-50 years, then Brakhage is your man. Wow, what a mindfuck this is. As for art, I feel the same about art as I feel about music and film: As long as you are doing something original, with a certain vision, i completely respect it. I love your post, Blogjammer. <3
Words fail me. They truly do.
I haven't seen any of the Brackhage, but if they're anything like The Sandlot, I'll pass. As for the art, I find all three pieces to be entertaining to some degree, and the lines of influence from the third piece to the pieces used at the Millard L. Webb film festival cannot be denied. The second piece I can't really judge. I'm not a fan of the genre and I have no eye for this form. I like my sculpture to be angular and completely unreasonable. This does not describe this piece, obviously. The first piece you've chosen is my favorite of the three. For one, it is a study in color, and I love all the great masters who specialized in color. This particular piece uses very bright, vivid colors, but the contrast and framing evoke a much darker feeling for me. It seems to resemble an open window, with the peach framing representing our comfort zone, on the inside. The yellow at the top represents how we see the outside world through the glass of the window. It is bright and sunny. Through the open section however, we see the darker orange as representative of how unwelcoming the outside world can really be. I like the piece that it can affect my mood in such a way, but I understand you feel the direct opposite from it, and perhaps that os a good thing, too.
I used the Mark Rothko piece for a CD label once. He also has one that's green and yellow. Colors are pretty. I know this only because I used it for a CD label, too.
Post a Comment
<< Home